Tuesday, December 12, 2006

Panic! At Jobbing.com Arena

Since I seem to be on a blogging binge lately, I totally forgot about some concerts I've seen/I'm going to see. First off, last week we saw "Panic! At the Disco", along with "Cobra Starship" and "Jack's Manaquinn." Now before I talk about this concert let me repeat something I said in a previous post. "Unwritten Law" is the worst live band I've ever seen. Period. I've seen high-school bands perform better. "Cobra Starship" came in just a little, tiny bit above "Unwritten Law." And that's really all I can say about that. They don't even get a picture. ;-)

"Jack's Mannequin" is a different story. Ok, ok. Their cover of U2's "With or Without You" probably caused cancer in at least 30% of the audience, but the rest of the music was pretty damn good. They had the soulfulness of "Train" without all the whining and touchy-feely lyrics, mixed with the edgier sounds of "Acceptance." If only the lead singer could decide if he wanted to sit or stand while singing and playing the piano. He had a sit-down piano, but he would half-stand to sing and ended up looking like he was having a seizure. When he sat his twitchy, flailing ass down it was much better and less epileptastic. Other than that, their music was quite good.


Which brings me to "Panic! At the Disco." Hands down, one of the best live shows I have ever seen. The sets were amazing! They did this whole circus theme (but dark and Victorian-looking) that was just awesome. They even had dancers that were acrobats and tumblers. Very cool. As for the music, it was stellar. "Panic" is one of the most musically talented bands I've seen in a long time. I can't even describe what their music is like, it's just so unique. Not to mention that have incredible stage presence. They did this really cool percussion number that was part "Stomp" (they had trash can lid cymbals and everything) and part drum-line. After that, they played a sweet cover of Queen's "Killer Queen." Wow. Damn good show indeed.

Today I'm going back to the same place (Glendale Arena, aka Jobbing.com Arena) to see "AFI", "Taking Back Sunday", "Plain White T's", and a few others. Show's called the "How the Edge Stole Chritmas." Should be a good one. I saw "AFI" last year at KFMA day (where I saw the Worst Live Band Ever the previous year) and really enjoyed their show. I've been itching to see them again. Should be fun! Check Josh's blog/Flickr feed for pics. He's into all that "photography" stuff. Wait...I used to be into that too. Damn.



Update: I too seem to be into all that "photography" stuff. I figured out what I hadn't been: I had no camera! Would've thought, eh?

Monday, December 11, 2006

Tremble mortals

Behold the mighty Cylon Snowbot!



Yes that's a sweeping Cylon eye. Yes it also makes scary Cylon sounds. And yes, it's being powered by my Xbox 360. That's right: The Xbox 360 is Cylon technology. w00t.

Now if only I can get it to make me a Number Six...



God I love Battlestar Galactica.

A foreword

I love literature. Ever since I was little I've always be reading something. Be it a book, a magazine, the newspaper, hell even cereal boxes. I liked comic books to a limited degree, but they had too many pictures and not enough words for my taste. Given the choice of "X-men" or "Of Mice and Men", I'd take the latter every time. This love of books was one of the reasons I decided to do an English minor. I figured as long as I enjoy reading and to a certain degree, writing, I might as well get some sort of recognition for doing things I like to do anyway.


My dad once commented that I would probably end up as an English professor one day. I knew that would never happen, but he can be forgiven this flight of fancy for his progeny as I had brought Paradise Lost as my book of choice along with me on a family ski trip. While it wasn't for a class so much as my own enjoyment (in a semi-masochistic way; it is Milton after all), it did have some practical applications: 340-year old poetry about Heaven, Hell, and Satan makes for good taunts for Counter-Strike.


With hideous ruin and combustion, down
To bottomless perdition, there to dwell
In adamantine chains and penal fire
who durst defy th' omnipotent to arms.


Heh, very Pulp Fiction. Useful for scaring "teh n00bs", or at least distracting them long enough with words like "omnipotent" to stab them in the back.


But I digress. The real reason for this post is this: I'm testing the waters with writing some book reviews. Nothing fancy. Just my thoughts on some books I've read. It'll mostly be stuff that I like, maybe even some commentary on a series as a whole. Maybe I can also get suggestions on new books for me to read. I've been kinda slacking on my reading for awhile, partially because I've just been busy and distracted but mostly because I just haven't branched out in a while. I tend to get really focused on an author I enjoy, and while I find that focus is wonderful for absorbing the whole of an author's works, it also means that once I'm done I have trouble pulling myself out of one dreamworld and plunging into another.


You'll mostly see sci-fi and fantasy books here. That's because I like fantasy and sci-fi. Sure I enjoy the fascinating look at a man's descent into madness in Heart of Darkness or the dark, brooding musings on the nature of crime and suffering in Crime and Punishment as much as the next person, but give me the sweeping battles and rich detail of Lord of the Rings or the mind-blowing dystopian view of the future in the cyberpunk novels like Neuromancer and Snow Crash.


Will I actually manage to review anything? Maybe. But for now, has anyone read any good books lately?

Monday, November 27, 2006




MPAA Press Release -

The following comments (censored for the safety of the viewing public) appeared on a community-driven news site known as Digg.com this afternoon in response to an article outlining the new strategy of the MPAA in combating the growing threat of home theater pirates:

"I violated (CENSORED) at least 5 times (CENSORED) my family...." – mainfr4me

This kind of reprehensible behavior is indicative of what the MPAA has become aware is normal behavior for this new breed of movie pirate. The MPAA will do all in it's power to crackdown on these violations by introducing new legislation to allow the installation of equipment that will monitor all home theater owners.

All movie viewing sessions will record the IDs of all viewers, along with recording their behavior and movements in case of suspicious behavior or defamatory comments about the MPAA, it's members, or the work produced by the member studios. The data will be sent to the MPAA's Special UnderCover Knowledge Enforcement Regimental Service (SUCKERS), which will then dispatch teams to homes in violation of copyrights. Such violations include, but are not limited to, viewing of films by those not owning a licensed copy of the work, including friends, enemies, lovers, teammates, strangers, coworkers, spouses, partners, children between the ages of 6 months and 150 years, family pets (of any type that have eyes, ears, or any other light or sound sensing organs), light-sensitive plants, people from any country containing the letters A, E, I, O, U, or Y or whose name contains any combination of said letters, and pests or insects that are present within 100 yards of the theater.

Any person or object found in violation of copyright laws, will be fined a minimum of $500,000 per movie viewing. Such persons will be labeled “enemy combatants” and will be dealt with accordingly by SUCKERS teams.

The viewing of copyrighted works without obtaining a license via the proper channels is a crime and is a "gateway" to harder violations such as music piracy, removing the "DO NOT REMOVE" tags from mattresses, jaywalking, speeding, walking on the grass, drug use, child molestation, organ harvesting, terrorism, and even full-scale illegal movie downloading and DVD copying for backup purposes.

The MPAA takes these matters very seriously because if such behavior is allowed to grow unchecked, it could threaten the very fabric of society and the family values upon which America is built. Unlicensed viewing of copyrighted works not only funds terrorism (as been proven by the Independent Department In Orthodox Terrorist Studies (IDIOTS)), but actually causes cancer in puppies and is a major contributing factor to global warming.

Original Digg post

Wednesday, November 08, 2006

HD-DVDland

Picture of my new toy: The Xbox 360 HD-DVD drive. That's right: HD-DVD baby! I can't wait!

The great thing is it will only cost about $100-140, even though the retail price is $199. How? Behold my fuzzy math:

+ $199 -- Price of HD-DVD drive
- $30 -- Discount for getting an Amazon.com credit card
- $30 -- Money from selling the free Universal Remote that is included
- $40 -- Money from selling the free HD-DVD copy of "King Kong" that is included

Total: $99

However I don't know if "King Kong" comes with the one I ordered, so it might only be a savings of $60 rather than $100, but we'll see. Either way it's the cheapest HD-DVD player you can get! Anyone care to join me for a innagural HD movie watching session? Maybe Friday?

Friday, October 20, 2006

OMFGSPLOSION!!!!!!! I'M F*CKING ENGAGED!!!!

That's right, Jen and I are tying the knot! I can't believe I actually proposed! I was so nervous and just kinda blurted it out, but she said YES!!! That's why she's the greatest person on the planet and I love her so much! w00000000t!!!!!!!

Thursday, October 19, 2006

Midterms

I hate midterms. They're not as bad as finals 'cause you still have half the semester to make it up, but they suck because they remind you that yeah, you have to do this a second time in 9 weeks. They're also just as hard as finals, but you don't have a week of no class to study for them. So all in all, they blow.

Midterm elections are kinda like that. They're half way between the big elections, they're just as important and complicated, but they just don't have as big a run-up or have the same feel as a presidential election.

So as we near zero hour of the elections, I just thought I would let everyone know which propositions and officials I'm voting for. These two sites-a blog, and a more official site-offer some guidelines and good explanations of each proposition. They blog is definately left-leaning, but still has good information for you red-types. ;)

Propositions - Yes Votes

  • 104
  • 106
  • 200
  • 201
  • 202
  • 203
  • 204
  • 205
  • 302

Senate & Congressional Candidates
  • Jim Pederson (despite the crappy TV ads)
  • Raúl Grijalva
Governor
  • Janet Napolitano
Phew, I don't know about you guys but I'll be taking a cheat sheet in with me! Everyone who is able should get out and vote, but ONLY if you're informed about what you are voting for. Remember, the descriptions on the ballot for each proposition are written by the groups that got it there in the first place, so they always try to make it sound appealing. Your best bet is to get more information so you can make an intelligent decision.

And to finish this little post, a video of my new hero Keith Olbermann. Listen and learn:

Best Dad Ever!!!...Dad gives best gift to son! Read then watch the video

This is an incredible story...and by far makes Dick Hoyt the best dad in the world award!

"I try to be a good father. Give my kids mulligans. Work nights to pay For their text messaging. Take them to swimsuit shoots. But compared with Dick Hoyt, I suck."

Read the article first and then watch the video

read more | digg story

Xbox 360 HD-DVD drive shipping November 7 in the US

So sayeth Gamestop at least. Not sure if this is accurate, but it would be nice it true. Now if only we can get it for the same price as Japan...

read more | digg story

Tuesday, October 03, 2006

We the people

Alright, so I've been studying the new bill, along with the Consitution (i.e. what Bush calls "just a piece of paper"), particularly Article III. From what I can tell it appears that the alarmism everyone is spouting is just that: alarmism. While I find this bill morally wrong and quite frankly disgusting, there really is nothing illegal about it. So here's what I've found.

First, The Supreme Court does have judicial review power (the power to review the legality of a law used to prosecute someone. Established by Marbury v. Madison), but they will only hear a case if it's a matter of law, not matters of fact. The issue has to be that the law that was used to prosecute someone is flawed or possibly unconstitutional. You cannot take your case to the Supreme Court if it's matters of fact, i.e. "That's not my DNA on the victim!"

Also the Supreme Court can only exercise judicial review if the law is challenged by a case. It can come to the Supreme Court in three ways:

  1. The Supreme Court decides to exercise original jurisdiction. This can only happen for cases involving ambassadors, or if a state is a party, i.e. Bob v. the state of Arizona. This is very rare and is usually only exercised in state v. state matters.
  2. A case is appealed to the Supreme Court from a lower federal court. Not situations allow for the right of appeal. Double jeopardy is one such situation. If someone is accused of murder and is acquitted, the State cannot appeal the ruling and try them again in a higher court.
  3. The Supreme Court issues a writ of certiorari. This is is an order by the appellate court to review the lower court's decision for legal error when no right of appeal exists. Four of the nine Supreme Court Justices must agree to issue the writ (known as the "rule of four")

Now, according to section 950g of this new bill, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has sole jurisdiction as the appeals court for this new military court. But in order to send a case to DC court, the convicted party must waive their right to have their case reviewed by appealing to the military court of review. Take a look:
Sec. 950g. Review by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and the Supreme Court

`(a) Exclusive Appellate Jurisdiction- (1)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit shall have exclusive jurisdiction to determine the validity of a final judgment rendered by a military commission (as approved by the convening authority) under this chapter.

`(B) The Court of Appeals may not review the final judgment until all other appeals under this chapter have been waived or exhausted.

`(2) A petition for review must be filed by the accused in the Court of Appeals not later than 20 days after the date on which--

`(A) written notice of the final decision of the Court of Military Commission Review is served on the accused or on defense counsel; or

`(B) the accused submits, in the form prescribed by section 950c of this title, a written notice waiving the right of the accused to review by the Court of Military Commission Review under section 950f of this title.

`(b) Standard for Review- In a case reviewed by it under this section, the Court of Appeals may act only with respect to matters of law.

`(c) Scope of Review- The jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals on an appeal under subsection (a) shall be limited to the consideration of--

`(1) whether the final decision was consistent with the standards and procedures specified in this chapter; and

`(2) to the extent applicable, the Constitution and the laws of the United States.

`(d) Supreme Court- The Supreme Court may review by writ of certiorari the final judgment of the Court of Appeals pursuant to section 1257 of title 28.


Once in the DC court, the case will then be reviewed and if the issue of constitutionality is valid, then the case can be appealed to the Supreme Court where a ruling can be made. Note that at any time either the DC court or the Supreme Court can reject the case. The Supreme Court can also review the case by exercising their power to submit a writ of certiorai. Again, only if this is a matter of law.

Now 950j states that
Except as otherwise provided in this chapter and notwithstanding any other provision of law (including section 2241 of title 28 or any other habeas corpus provision), no court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider any claim or cause of action whatsoever, including any action pending on or filed after the date of the enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006, relating to the prosecution, trial, or judgment of a military commission under this chapter, including challenges to the lawfulness of procedures of military commissions under this chapter.

That first phrase "Except as otherwise provided in this chapter " is critical. What this is saying is that other than the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and the Supreme Court, no OTHER courts may challenge the decisions of this military court. This is perfectly legal as the federal courts are given power by congress, and congress can limit their scope and jurisdiction. They are simply limiting the appeals to a single court. In other-words, you can't appeal to the court of appeals in California or Washington.

Congress has no power to limit the Supreme Court's jurisdiction, short of passing an amendment to the Constitution (which would never happen). No matter how much Bush flails and whines and complains and makes new courts, the Supreme Court has the power to overturn any lower court, including military courts. This is part of the checks and balances. The check against the Supreme Court is that they can only make rulings if a case is challenged and brought before them.

You can disagree with a law passed by Congress while still agreeing it's perfectly legal. I despise this bill and I'm not sure it's entirely legal, but we will see. Making certain kinds of torture legal and suspending habeus corpus for detainees is wrong. If the US wants to be a world leader, we have to hold ourselves to higher standards than everyone else. Part of that is how we treat our prisoners. By giving even "enemy combatants" the same legal rights as citizens, giving them a fair trial, and treating them as human beings, we can prove to the world that we are truly better than those that hide behind religion as an excuse for killing.

By ordaining torture, suspending the rights of those we capture and continuing a pointless and morally reprehensible war, we are saying that we care more about ourselves then about the rest of the world. And selfish leaders always do more harm than good.

Friday, September 29, 2006

All your rights are belong to us.

This is just getting worse and worse. First there's the wiretapping bill (which thankfully looks like it will die), now this. There's a lot of uninformed opinions on this one, but the gist of it is that Congress has approved military tribunals for "enemy combatants", with no rights of habeus corpus, and no limits on detention length severity of punishment. In fact the bill specifically states that no Federal court has the power to hear habeus corpus cases!

This effectively gives the Executive Branch judical power over anyone they label a terrorist, with no oversight by the 200+ year-old US court system. And US Citizens? Yup, they are also included, though they retain their habeus corpus rights.

We've never done this before. The terrorist that bombed the WTC in 1993 was tried in a Federal Court. The guys behind the Oklahoma City bombing were tried in a Federal court. Now they fall under this new category where everything is controlled by the military, which is part of the Executive Branch and answers to the President. Which means one branch is now judge, jury, and executioner.

I hate the current state of this country. Every day the people of American let more and more of their rights be eroded and taken away, all in the name of security. You know what's really frightening? This has happened before. In the 1940s. In Germany. Care to take a guess of whom I am speaking? Correct. Hitler set up the People's Court to handle those accused of political criminal offences. It was established after a terrorist attack on Germany known as the Reichstag fire. It had the appearance of a court, but it nothing more than a facade to facilitate the elimination of people that Hitler deemed troublesome. Most were executed or imprisoned, including people as young as 17 and college students who distributed anti-war material.

How long before a direct attack on the Bill of Rights itself? "We can't have 'terrorists' pleading the 5th, so we better get rid of that one." Or "If we have a public trial, it might be a terrorist target so we better have the trials in secret." Or even "Ah hell! We KNOW their guilty! They're TERRORISTS after all! So let's just skip the whole trial thing and kill 'em."



read more | digg story

Tuesday, September 26, 2006

Somebody set us up the sex bomb!

A little g33k poetry courtesy of Bash.org:

WallJam7: roses are red
WallJam7: violets are blue
WallJam7: all of my base
WallJam7: are belong to you

Breathtaking hi-res Okami Wallpapers


Who knew a video game could be this beautiful? These are works of art! I'm tempted to print a few out with a super high-quality photo printer and get them framed.

read more | digg story

Thursday, September 21, 2006

Geek/Nerd/Dork quiz












Modern, Cool Nerd

56 % Nerd, 78% Geek, 34% Dork

For The Record:



A Nerd is someone who is passionate about learning/being smart/academia.

A Geek is someone who is passionate about some particular area or subject, often an obscure or difficult one.

A Dork is someone who has difficulty with common social expectations/interactions.



You scored better than half in Nerd and Geek, earning you the title of: Modern, Cool Nerd.



Nerds didn't use to be cool, but in the 90's that all changed. It used to be that, if you were a computer expert, you had to wear plaid or a pocket protector or suspenders or something that announced to the world that you couldn't quite fit in. Not anymore. Now, the intelligent and geeky have eked out for themselves a modicum of respect at the very least, and "geek is chic." The Modern, Cool Nerd is intelligent, knowledgable and always the person to call in a crisis (needing computer advice/an arcane bit of trivia knowledge). They are the one you want as your lifeline in Who Wants to Be a Millionaire (or the one up there, winning the million bucks)!



Congratulations!




Also, you might want to check out some of my other tests if you're interested in any of the following:



Buffy the Vampire Slayer




Professional Wrestling






Love & Sexuality




America/Politics




Thanks Again! -- THE NERD? GEEK? OR DORK? TEST
















My test tracked 3 variables How you compared to other people your age and gender:
free online datingfree online dating
You scored higher than 57% on nerdiness
free online datingfree online dating
You scored higher than 97% on geekosity
free online datingfree online dating
You scored higher than 56% on dork points




Link: The Nerd? Geek? or Dork? Test written by donathos on OkCupid, home of the 32-Type Dating Test

Monday, September 18, 2006

What are they teaching those ASU girls?

Via Overheard In the Office:

Coed #1: He had told me not to do anything special for his birthday. He said to forget he was having a birthday at all. But then he came over, and I could tell that he was down.
Coed #2: Because it was his birthday, and he was thirty.
Coed #1: Yeah.
Coed #2: And he's dating an eighteen-year-old.
Coed #1: Shut up. So then we had sex? And it wasn't, like, the most amazing time, but I faked it. But, like, really over the top? And he was happy the rest of the day!

University & College Avenues
Tempe, Arizona

Honda Fit Tetris Commercial

Honda + Tetris = Awsome geek commercial goodness



read more | digg story

Saturday, September 09, 2006

It's Showtime...


...and it's about FUCKING time too. Recently Apple sent out invitations to the press to attend a special keynote address by Steve "Reality Distortion Field" Jobs at the Paris Apple Expo. The invitations simply read "It's Showtime."

Apple has been slacking on product announcements for awhile now. Sure the Nano was cool and the transition to Intel was a much-appreciated speed boost (and one step closer to unifying personal computing), but we haven't seen anything truely exciting or ground-breaking from the Cupertino folks in a long time. iPod Hi-Fi? Nike+iPod? Fun, but please; these are toys.

To be fair, Josh does have a Hi-Fi and while I still think it's overpriced, it does sound pretty damn good, even on batteries. But the point is that nothing really new has come out of Apple for awhile. So when rumors started swirling about a special event on Sept. 12th, the Mac forums lit up with rampant speculation and wild claims. Everything from a Windows Media Center killer, to the iTunes Movie Store, to the fabled "widescreen iPod" and even the near mythical iPhone is being touted as the big announcement.

Well if you filter out all the craziness, most people agree that this is the most likely list of things being introduced:

  • Updated iPod Nano - Up to 8GB, metal shell, multiple colors (wait...where have I seen this before?)
  • iTunes Movie Store - Kinda self-explanatory, but own or rent?
  • Core 2 Duo - Replacing of the Core Duos with Core 2 Duos in the iMac and MacBook lines
  • 23" iMac - Better, faster, stronger
  • Mac Mini Refresh - Core Solo getting the axe, Core Duos for both models
  • Updated 5th gen iPods - Same price point, but with 40 and 80GB drives
  • And one more thing...

Pretty good lineup for a special event. Just about everything seems to be revolving around making a Mac and an iPod the center of your music AND movie experience. But still, nothing revolutionary right?

Wrong.

On Sept. 5th, with no warning, annoucement, or fanfare (and completely surprising, well, EVERYONE), Apple released all new iMacs with Core 2 Duo processers, added a 24" iMac that is HD-capable (i.e. 1080p), reduced the price of the two smaller models, AND refreshed the Mac Mini line while keeping the same price point. Whoa. Oh and did I mention that the 24" iMac is now VESA-compliant? Meaning you can mount it on the wall like any modern plasma or LCD HDTV. And at 24", it's ready to be a prime HD-capable entertainment device.

It's interesting to note that every previous annoucement of new or updated Intel-based Macs was done at either a special event or a normal expor like MacWorld or WWDC. Which begs the question: What could possibly be happening on the 12th that an update of TWO entire computer lines, AND the introduction of a completely new model was deemed too minor to warrant sharing the stage with this unknown annoucement? Whatever it is, it's BIG. Like possibly the biggest thing Apple has done since, well possibly the iPod.

I mean when you have a special event to introduce a battery-powered boombox and an FM tuner and NOTHING ELSE, stiffing the new 24" iMac of anything less than the full Steve Jobs-black-turtleneck-and-jeans treatment means that something is happening that has been in the works for a long time. Something that could be incredible. Something that should have EVERY company in the ENTIRE digital entertainment business SCARED SHITLESS.

Friday, August 18, 2006

Should've turned left at Google Calendar

Ever take a wrong turn while driving and discoverd some cool little shop or restaurant you never would have found otherwise? Sometimes the Internet is like that. Mispell the URL you are typing and usually you get an error. But sometimes it takes you to another site. Often, porn. However every now and then you find some neat little place that makes you wonder just how many hidden gems the Internet has tucked away deep in the server mines.

For example, I was trying to get Gmail. I usually type so fast that I don't notice when I've mispelled something. So when I tried to type "www.gmail.com" I actually typed "www.gamil.com" And what did I find? Well Gamila is a company from that makes a couple of very cool items. An iPod case, and the TeaStick (a very slick tea infuser). Never would have found this site if I hadn't mistyped Gmail. Anyway, just thought I'd share. :)

Thursday, August 17, 2006

Video game reviews can kiss my ass


I've had it with game reviewers. I literally can't stand it any more. I've tried so hard to read reviews and believe that I am getting an informed, unbiased analysis of a game. But after reading review after review criticizing the game "Ninety-Nine Nights" for what I consider to be petty and shallow reasons, I've come to the conclusion that game reviews are jaded, arrogant, spoiled, snobbish, and many times just whiny. For example:

"The action starts out completely mindless and wears even thinner as time goes on."
-Gamespot

"Ninety-Nine Nights is a game that is hard to get immersed in and even harder to enjoy."
-IGN.com

"Some irritating design decisions, combined with horrible voice acting and the generally repetitious nature of the action, results in a game with limited appeal for a mass audience."
-1UP.com

The reason I find these types of comments worthless is they seem to come from someone who hasn't spent more than a few hours with a game. That's not enough to give a proper review man! That like taking a new car out for a test drive, and 1/3 of the way through you just stop and say "Ok, I'm going to write a review of this entire car after driving it for 30 min."

I like to believe that they take their time and first flip through the manual to see if there's anything important in there. Is there background story? Character histories? Hey what a concept! Game manuals used to have tons of story and background stuff in there. So if you wanted the complete experience, you had to RTFM!!! Games have moved away from this, but sometimes time and budget constraints force game designers to set up the story and give background on the characters by writing it in the manual rather than making extra cinematics or cut-scenes. "Homeworld" was an excellent example of this. In addition to a rich and deep storyline, there was literally a novella in the manual on the history of the game universe.

The problem is most game reviewers want/need to crank out a review after a few hours of playing the game. They don't have the time or the patience to delve more deeply into a game to try and understand it. They just jump in, start playing and if they don't "get it" within a few minutes, the score suffers and they claim it has a "weak" story. For example, in the game "Ninety-Nine Nights" (N3), one of the main characters Inphyy is lost in the woods and suddenly sees a vision of her older brother, which then chastises her, calling her evil and a coward and that she'll be damned for her actions on the battlefield (on the previous mission she kills enemy civilians during the battle). On it's own, this scene doesn't make much sense and seems out of place. But if you read the manual section about her character, you'll find out that while she puts on a strong exterior, her intense adoration of her brother coupled with being only 17, shows that she is quite fragile and immature.

But this kind of depth is almost unilaterally ignored by the game reviewers because it is not handed to you by the game. Since this is the more modern approach to gaming, it is something that is expected and when a game takes an old-school approach like N3, people complain. True, a game that does nothing to advance the story is grounds for a poor review but not taking the time to understand what is going on before passing judgment is irresponsible at best. I mean everyone has had the experience where you didn't understand a movie the first time, but when it dawns on you realize how much better the movie was.

Bah, I could go on but I still haven't finished N3 yet, so I can't in good conscience continue thrashing the game reviews before I have experienced the entire game myself. But I expect it will be similar. Bottom line: Take any game review with a very large grain of salt. Hell take it with a whole salt lick.

Sunday, May 07, 2006

A long time and a new toy...

Ok, so I think a month and a week is a good, long time to wait between posts. Geez, why haven't I updated this? Well I guess my reasoning was that I was in the process of making a major decision about something, and I wanted to make that final before I posted about it. But I got so caught up in the whole thing that I kinda forgot about posting. But I'm back now, so here it goes.

Some people were aware that I was looking for a new car. I actually started looking almost a year ago when I first started my job, but I didn't get far. I started with the new VW Jetta, moved into SUV territory with the Nissan Murano and Xterra, and even toyed with the new Toyota RAV4. But none of those excited me for more than a week or so, which to those who know me well means I'm really not interested. Then Chris got his Mazda RX-8, and I started looking at the Mazda6 and the Mazdaspeed6, which quickly in the same way as the others.

Then after a week of playing "Need for Speed: Most Wanted" on my 360, I decided (just for kicks) to see how much a Porsche 911 or a Carerra GT goes for these days. Needless to say, it was rather pricey. As is the Cayanne (Porsche's SUV), though if you go for the $100k Cayanne Turbo S, you will have the fastest SUV on the road. And I kid you not when I say it's nearly as fast as a 911 Turbo: 0-60 mph in 4.8 seconds. In a fucking SUV. Damn .

But as I was looking at these dream cars that I won't be able to afford for a looooong time, I just happened to notice that, at the bottom of the Cars.com page, were a bunch of Boxsters for under $20k. Sure they were older, but these were hot cars! And I could afford one! An idea started brewing until....


Yup, you're looking at my new 2002 Porsche Boxster S. Traded in my Honda Prelude and got a great deal for it. Only had 33k miles on it too! The Prelude had more than that when I traded it in, so this was a great deal. I'm still a bit stunned that I drive a Porsche. I'm getting used to this as "my car" but it's still hard to wrap my head around. Anyway, here's some pics I took while on a drive up Mt. Lemmon today (like the one above) with Chris (or you can see my Flickr slideshow here):




Friday, March 24, 2006

March Idiotness - The guy with the worst NCAA bracket of all time

Ok, I just HAD to post this story. It...well there are just no words. None. The unbelieveably vast pit of pure incompetence that lurks in this guy's head is just staggering. It must be read to be believed.

March Madness

Now I bet you're expecting me to talk about the Men's NCAA Basketball Tournament, right? While I am thoroughly enjoying the tourney so far (even though my brackets are now totally screwed thanks to LSU's ousting of Duke and Gonzaga's jaw-dropping collapse in the final seconds against UCLA), I am in fact speaking of the Xbox 360 Gamerscore contest between Josh, Brad, and myself.

It's been pretty close between Josh and I the past week, and now that we are entering the home stretch it looks like it might be a photo finish. But Brad is still the dark horse in all this as he has a lot of games that could potentially put him over the top, but we'll just have to wait and see.

To ensure that we don't lose track of the time, I've put a countdown timer on my blog to track how much time we have left. It's set to expire at 12:01 AM April 1, so when you see the words "Game over!", it's done, no more, el fin.

I'm thinking it might be time to rent some games this weekend. Hmm...what to choose.

Tuesday, March 07, 2006

Fun with the CS lab Nazi

This is the week for funny spam emails. I just recently got this one from none other than the CS Lab Nazi: John P. Cropper:

You have been violating the quota restrictions on
your CS alumni account for CGI space and have now
received 33 warnings.

Your WWW and CGI areas have been removed and your CS
alumni account scheduled for removal in May 2006

John Cropper
CS 'lab' staff
Hmmm...33 warnings, eh? Let's use a little math to determine just how much I care:

(33 warnings - 33 messages from 'root' that were flagged as spam) + 1 annoyed email from Cropper - 1 sarcastically replied to email from Cropper = 0 care level

Frankly, I was tired of the damn "over quota restrictions" emails and I was going to actually do something about it...but then I realized it would be more fun to see how long they would stand for my deliciously obscene quota violations. Turns out that 33 is the magic number where they finally snapped. Looks like I'm losing my alumni account. Gee, I feel real sad you know?

True, I did have my forums running on there but after my time as a CS127a section leader was up, they didn't get used anymore. Plus I can always host them somewhere else if I feel like it.

Monday, March 06, 2006

Pretty fire gym

Ok, the spam e-mails have just started getting wacky now. Not the usual "Increase you penis size with cheap viagra + free ink cartridges!" But getting borderline insane. I mean, it's like they aren't even trying to sell you crap anymore. Now they just have raving lunatics with laptops and access to Babelfsih writing their ads for them. Take a look. Here is a spam e-mail I got a few weeks ago, with the subject line "XP PRO, OFFICE 2003 AND ALL AT ONLY $12-60 EACH, WE GIVE U LICENSE":

side mentioned principle pretty fire gym. here find news wife profession make. latter why black bad light social.
black here thus speaking pride.
my human commit. happened anything yours again.
wife here wife different? sandwich anybody studied bought light immediate, thats is few.
motor commit taught respect wrong, window latter being.

And here's one I got this morning (same subject line):
anybody back window sugar mentioned wrong. corner sandwich edge disappoint anything. miserable happened social?
happened bought again. fascinate added similar side disappoint here,
prison bought sandwich commit somewhere,
studied goes rich wanted.
night supposedto principle. find reference fascinate use, mischievous taught supposedto?


Wow. Just wow.

Saturday, March 04, 2006

30 books you should read before you die

Found this through Fark of all places. Apparantly librarians all over Britain were polled about what books everyone should read before they die. Since I think this is a great list, I'm presenting it here. (I've hightlighted books I've read in bold)

  1. To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee
  2. The Bible
  3. The Lord of the Rings Trilogy by JRR Tolkien
  4. 1984 by George Orwell
  5. A Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens
  6. Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte
  7. Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen
  8. All Quiet on the Western Front by E M Remarque
  9. His Dark Materials Trilogy by Phillip Pullman
  10. Birdsong by Sebastian Faulks
  11. The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck
  12. The Lord of the Flies by William Golding
  13. The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time by Mark Haddon
  14. Tess of the D'urbevilles by Thomas Hardy
  15. Winnie the Pooh by AA Milne
  16. Wuthering Heights by Emily Bronte
  17. The Wind in the Willows by Kenneth Graham
  18. Gone With the Wind by Margaret Mitchell
  19. Great Expectations by Charles Dickens
  20. The Time Traveller's Wife by Audrey Niffenegger
  21. The Lovely Bones by Alice Sebold
  22. The Prophet by Khalil Gibran
  23. David Copperfield by Charles Dickens
  24. The Alchemist by Paulo Coelho
  25. The Master and Margarita by Mikhail Bulgakov
  26. Life of Pi by Yann Martel
  27. Middlemarch by George Eliot
  28. The Poisonwood Bible by Barbara Kingsolver
  29. A Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess
  30. A Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich by Alexander Solzenhitsyn
So I haven't read a lot of these, but I feel good that I've read the top 5 (well not ALL of the Bible, but some if it at least). Looks like I've got some work to do. Oh and here's the original story.

Thursday, March 02, 2006

Laser chess? Hell yeah!

Check out this sweet game called Deflexion! It's similar to chess, except some of the pieces have mirrros on them that reflect a laser beam around the board. To win you have to position your pieces (which are Egyptian themed) to strike the other player's pharoh (i.e. checkmate). Only $40 too. Man this would turn a few heads down at Starbucks :-p. Check out the site.

Monday, February 27, 2006

The greatest 4 minutes in basketball history

You hardcore sports fans may disagree with me on this one, but it's because of stuff like this that we play sports:

Edit 2: Haha, looks like it wasn't my fault! Josh just posted that CBS pulled the video! Guess YouTube was getting more views than the CBS stations. I've reposted the video (now it's from CNN). Man this post is the most work I've had to do for awhile.

Edit: Ok, WTF? I just copied and pasted the embedded code from YouTube twice, and for some reason it's working now. Just in case, I've put the link up here.

Monday, February 20, 2006

Let the games begin!

In the spirit of friendly competition such as the Winter Olympics in Torino, Italy, myself and a few friends have decided to have a little Xbox 360 contest. As most people know, the new Xbox Live has a point system that awards players points for achieving certain goals in different games. These goals are called Achievements, and the points earned are called Gamer Points.

Now this whole thing started when Josh got his 360 first and started earning points. I got mine about two months later and, after some marathon sessions on Call of Duty 2, passed him up. And since both of us are naturally competitive when it comes to games, we decided "What the hell! Let's have a real contest! Most points by some date wins." The prize? A whole bunch of Microsoft points (not the same as Gamer Points), which are the currency used in the Xbox Live Marketplace to buy Xbox Live Arcade games, Xbox Live Dashboard skins, and gamer pictures. We even managed to get Brad to join (with a 2000 point handicap since he started late). So, here are the terms, prizes, etc.:

  • The contest ends at 12:01 AM, April 1st 2006. Any points earned after that time will not be counted.
  • The contest consists of Mike Deats (SQUIDwarrior), Brad Dux (IcedError) and Josh Schlag (schlizzag).
  • The winner will be determined by whomever has the most points by the date stated above.
  • Each participant will put 1600 Microsoft points (equivalent to approx. $20) into the pot, winner takes all.
  • Co-op points are allowed (i.e. co-op missions in Perfect Dark Zero or Kameo, either with each other or with other gamers.
  • Trash-talking is highly encouraged.
  • Mike will pwn you all.
Ok, I added that last bit but it is in accordance with the trash-talking rule.

So that's it. There's a little over a month to go and so far it's been a blast! There's still lots to go so make sure you keep up and may the best gamer win!

Friday, February 17, 2006

Dreams really can come true...

Many people know that one of my all-time favorite games is a little-known gem known as System Shock 2 (SS2. WARNING! This link has plot spoilers, so be warned!). It was released in 1999 and continues the story of "the Hacker" (you) from the original System Shock game (1993). SS2 won many Game of the Year titles in 1999, and it almost always shows up on "Greatest Games of All Time" lists (PC Gamer had it as number #5). It's mixture of atmosphere, plot, unique challenges and character-driven storytelling, plus some mind-bending plot twists, make it one of the most original and breathtaking games ever pressed to a CD. In fact, 7 years later, there is still an active (even rabid) fan base that is still creating new maps, missions, and even upgrading the graphics and gameplay models.

I first played SS2 around 2002 I think. My roommates at the time said "Ok, you HAVE to play this game. You have to play it in the dark, alone, with either surround sound or some serious headphones. And you have to play it loud." So I did. And boy, once I got about half-an-hour into the game, I began to become afraid. I was literally TERRIFIED at times. Never has a game made me so paranoid or edgy in my entire life. There were times that I felt that my own life was in mortal danger; that the game was trying to kill ME. I kid you not. I think these quotes from Gamespot's "Greatest Games of All Time" write up about SS2 really sums up what made SS2 so great:

The game was scary. Damn scary. And this isn't schlocky-horror-movie-style monster-closet scary, where the bogeyman jumps out at you when you least expect it. Shock 2 projected real psychological terror through the tragic grotesquery of the formerly human enemies, the urgency and grim portent of the crew members' audio logs, and the unparalleled sound design that brought the menace and forebodingness of the Von Braun to horrible life.

... Sometimes characters are betrayed, but the player never is. I wanted to violate that trust and make the player feel that they, and not [only] the character, were led on and deceived." - Ken Lavine, General Manager, Irrational Games

System Shock introduced what is, in my opinion, the most incredible villain in gaming history: The female AI SHODAN (WARNING! This link has spoilers, though they aren't too bad. You have been warned). Most villains in video games are simply trying to kill you, and so you try and kill them back. SHODAN was much more insidious than that. She was manipulative, scheming, and unquestioningly evil. I remember one part where you have an uneasy alliance as you're both trying not to die, and she provides you with some supplies to help you with your mission (essentially enhancements to your cybernetic implants). During this particular chapter, you find an empty storage compartment with the door stuck half open. Since your weapons are constantly deteriorating and you have very limited ammo, you tend to explore everything you can (you will never be as excited over finding 5 bullets as you are in SS2, trust me). As you approach the room, SHODAN pipes up to warn you (rather menacingly) that you are running out of time and need to get on with your mission. You now have a choice. Do you enter the compartment and explore, or do you obey SHODAN and continue?

Well if you make the choice to explore, you will come across something that tells you that SHODAN is more involved with what is going on than she wants you to believe, and that something is horribly, horribly wrong. Once you exit the room, SHODAN promptly removes your upgrades and says, ominously,
I hope you enjoyed your little rebellion, irritant. But remember, what SHODAN gives she is more than able to take away.

Damn, when creepy computer AIs start paraphrasing scripture, you know you've got problems. When she said that to me the first time, I felt the hairs on the back of my neck rise. Though by far the best quote that really epitomizes all that makes SHODAN at once a wonderful and terrifying villain can be summed up in this audio clip. (It's in the Ogg Vorbis format, so you'll need this codec to play it). There's also this collection of quotes from both SS and SS2. There are spoilers here, so be careful if you want to be completely surprised.

So why am I posting all this you ask yourself? Maybe it's pure sentiment for my past, like my post about Babylon 5. Maybe it's my revitalized interest in video games thanks to my Xbox 360. I think in truth it is closer to something in between. The main reason I am posting this is because Irrational Games (makers of the System Shock series), are making what they call a "spiritual successor" to SS2 called BioShock. Gamespot has a great retrospective on SS2 that really ties in with this concept.

Needless to say, I can't wait. It's supposed to come out in 2007 for PC and 360. It's set in the late 1960s, in an "intellectual utopia" community known as Rapture that just so happens to reside at the bottom of the ocean. You awaken floating in the ocean with survival the only goal in mind, and you soon find yourself trapped in this bizarre world (much like how you find yourself on the Von Braun, the spaceship you wakeup on in SS2) Game Informer had a feature on this game in the latest issue and am positively giddy with excitement. This is one of my gaming dreams come true (with the other being Freespace 3, but that's another story). While it's not System Shock 3, it is at least the same team that made SS2 and they are going to take the same concepts and game mechanics and mold them into a new game.

2007 can't get here fast enough.

Tuesday, February 14, 2006

I hate Valentine's Day...and cruises rule

I have the best girlfriend in the entire world. For many, many reasons. But the main one I wanted to mention is the fact that Jen doesn't like Valentine's Day. Hates it, in fact. Which is great for me because I don't have to do anything or plan anything special, jsut because someone said today is supposed to be romantic for no particular reason. And since our anniversery is on the 3rd of February anyway, it'd be kinda anticlimatic to do something extravagent 11 days later. Oh well.

On the brighter side, Jen and I are going on a cruise in March! I didn't think we'd be able to do a cruise because of airfare and all that, but I found a 3-day out of Los Angeles to Mexico for a great price! And if we leave early enough, we can just drive all day and then relax on the ship that night. Our itenerary looks like this:

  • Friday (3/10): Depart from Los Angeles at 5:30pm
  • Saturday: Arrive in Ensenada Mexico at 8:00am. Depart at 6:00pm.
  • Sunday: Day at sea.
  • Monday: Arrive back in LA at 8:00am
I'm really excited because this will be my first real vacation that I paid for myself. Makes me fell all grown up. :-P

Well that's all for now kids. Back to my Xbox 360. Gotta start rackin' up the points.

Sunday, February 05, 2006

Google: Naughty BMW! Naughty! No page ranking for you!

So BMW thought that their "ultimate driving machine" status entitled them to try and cheat the "ultimate searching machine." It seems that BMW's German page (yup, their home country's page no less) used a trick called "doorway pages" which trick search engine ranking systems to make them value pages more highly. Right. Because BMW really NEEDS to let people know via Google about their cars. If this were Fark, this story would have the "dumbass" tag. So when Google found out about it, they issued the "Google Death Penalty" to the page. They gave the page a ranking of 0, effectively removing it from search results.

Check out the full story on Boing Boing.

Tuesday, January 31, 2006

3D Room Paintings

Check this out! The first pic shows what appears to be a 3D image superimposed over a picture of a room. But the second pic shows that the 3D-looking image is actually painted ON the room to appear 3D. Neat optical effect!




Clicky here for more.

Monday, January 30, 2006

Project Gotham (Dirty) Racing

Last night I decided to give PGR3 on Live a try. Well, on the one hand it is very well done, and 99% of the time it's a blast. But that 1%, well it just sucks. The reason is dirty racers. I didn't think it would bother me, but after playing a few dozen races I just can't stand it. These people will ram you into walls, spin out your car for no reason, and even T-bone you if you are already spun out and are trying to right yourself.

Now granted, this kind of thing happens by accident often, and the cars will start spinning pretty quickly. But it's one thing to pass someone on the inside of a turn and accidentally nudge their tail while they're powersliding, and quite another to purposefully spin someone for no reason.

Case in point. I was in a high-speed race that had several crazy corners, and a rather long straightaway. As usual with these races, I was near the back. 7th (out of 8) to be precise. Going into the straightaway, I hit the turn too fast and smacked the wall, while the guy behind me managed to slingshot through nicely. I watched him come up behind me, and I moved to the right since I knew he would pass me and there was nothing I could do about it. Does he just pass me up and then we duke it out at the next turn? Nope. He comes up behind me, and nudges my back end. I spin around twice and slam into the wall. I just sat there fuming, and then backed up and continued the race (because no matter how bad I am doing in a race, I always finish). I was so far behind at that point that I never even saw another car and the time ran out before I could finish.

I was pretty miffed. I mean he could have passed me and finished the race fair and square, (you know because 7th is so much better than 8th at that point), but he felt the need to spin me out when I was LETTING him pass. I could have cut him off and tried to clip him going into the next corner, but I don't race like that. Maybe I should, because it seems that the only way to win on Live is to race dirty. I've seen it happen. The guy in second on the last lap, who has been slamming people into the walls and spinning them over the place, manages to nail the guy in first who's been hitting his race lines the whole time, and wins. I suppose it's inevitable that when people get their hands on any game that has competitive play, they will do anything to give them the edge.

The funny thing is, the guy that spun me can dish it out, but he can't take it. After the race I set his as Non-preferred player for Unsportsman-like conduct, and he sends me a message bitching about how I gave him bad feedback. So I blocked communication from him. Dude if you're going to be an ass, don't be a whiny ass.

But despite this, I really had fun, even though I kinda suck. Hey, I've won 1 race so far. So that's something. I'm not going to let anyone ruin this game for me, so if people are racing dirty, who the hell cares. I'd like it to stop, but it never will. All I can do is just stick to my guns and know that whatever place I come in, it won't be because I cheated to get there.

Saturday, January 28, 2006

Firefly posibly coming back in a DVD-only format!!!

Edit: I'm not entirely sure this site is legit, even though I want it to be. For now, take this with a grain of salt.

"A New independent film company is looking to bring back firefly in a DVD-only format! Check out this site and take the survey, if enough people sign up they will re-hire the serenity crew! If you like the show at all please fill this out and don't let the series die. You can't stop the signal."

This is the latest top Digg story and I HAD to blog it! This would be so AWSOME if they managed to get the rights to the show. If you loved "Firefly," head to the site and submit your "Browncoat recruit profile." They say the more interest they get the closer this is to being a reality.

read more | digg story

The 5th Element


Ok, so it's a bit of an odd subject but today I listened to the first show of a new podcast being put on by some of the regulars on Slice of Sci-Fi which just so happens to be dedicated to Babylon 5. For those that never watched the show, it was a radical new format for sci-fi shows since pretty much anything in the genre at that generally had something to do with some sort of trek through the stars. The main difference was B5 was planned from the beginning with a complete story arc that would span a full 5 seasons or more (depending on how well the show did). It was quite different from the stand-alone episodes that "Star Trek: The Next Generation" was known for.

The main setting for the story took place on a space station called (you guessed it) Babylon 5. Why 5? Well it just so happens that the first 4 suffered engineering accidents, sabotage, or just plain disappeared. I guess 5th time's the charm, eh? The station itself is fascinating, mainly because one of the central themes of the show was the cultural diversity between all the races living on the station. Bruce Boxleitner (station commander for seasons 2-5) described it as "A free port for diplomats, travelers and businessmen. A combination of building the United Nations and Times Square on an intergalactic scale."

Why am I mentioning this? Why does it matter? Because I love this show, and I feel the need to let other people know about it. In my view it stands head and shoulders above any other sci-fi series to date, including "Star Trek." No, that's not quite true. It STOOD head and shoulders above the rest. B5 has been my gold standard against which all new sci-fi shows are judged. The only shows to gain equal footing with B5 in my mind, are of course "Firefly", and the new "Battlestar Galactica." And let me tell you, coming from me, that is the HIGHEST praise I can bestow.

These shows MEAN something to me. They are a part of my life and as such, a part of my culture. Sure, I watch "CSI" and "Law and Order: SVU," but those shows are just passing through. Nothing compares to the depth and sophistication that B5 displayed in it's 5 year run. B5 dealt with such deep subjects as addiction, self-sacrifice, and most importantly: The struggle between authoritarianism vs. chaos; light vs. dark vs. gray. The gray is especially important because it is often the people caught in the middle of great conflict that suffer the most. War is obviously pivotal to the series, but it is the focus on the untold "third side" of the conflict that truly makes this series stand out. I guess you could say this was the first show that I really cared about. It was so easy to simply let myself be absorbed into the B5 universe and really delve into the story and the characters lives.

Maybe that's a little weird, but in fact I think it's completely normal. Babylon 5 is an epic story, told in the same tradition as the great stories of old: "The Iliad," "Beowulf," "Macbeth." The only difference is the medium; the central themes are still there. This is not just mindless entertainment, nor is it overly cerebral and pretentious. Rather it strikes a balance between being enormously fun to watch, and being deeply philosophical and insightful.

Anyone who hasn't seen this show doesn't know what their missing. Find someone with the DVDs and ask to borrow season 1, or put it in your Netflix queue. Or even buy the crappy Asian import DVDs for $10 and see if you like it. If you give it a chance and watch season 1, it just gets better and better from there.

Well, that's all I have tonight. I got a little philosophical and even waxed a bit nostalgic with this entry, but hey. That's why this is "Mike's Pensieve." ;-)

Wednesday, January 25, 2006

Mmmm...Podcastilicious

As everyone else has been doing this, I figured it was time for me to give it a whirl. So here are the podcasts I listen to at least semi-regularly. I love podcasts. They keep me sane on my drive to work and help the day go by so much faster. Plus it keeps me up to date on news and goin's ons. Though most of them deal with tech and sci-fi stuff, but hey: That's what I'm into. So without further ado, here we go. Oh, BTW, you can get all of these off of iTunes for those with iPods.

  • This Week in Tech (TWiT) - This podcast is great. It's run by a bunch of ex-TechTV hosts and technology journalists. The main character, so to speak, is Leo Laporte who plays host and at time mediator between the other eccentric personalities such as Kevin Rose (one of the brains behind Digg.com) and PC Magazine columnist John C. Dvorak (who gets NO SPAM!!!). Always sharp, witty, interesting, and at times brutally honest.

  • Major Nelson's Blogcast - Larry Hryb (aka Major Nelson) is the Director of the Xbox Live Programming division at Microsoft. He has great inside info on the Xbox 360, and has done some very interesting interviews with many of the minds behind the Xbox, including one of my former Computer Science section leaders at UofA, David Shaw. If you're into gaming, especially Xbox, this is a good one.

  • Science Friday - This is the podcast version of the highly popular NPR show. It deals with everything from medical advances, global warming, technology trends, and even the ethics of highly controversial science subjects. This is one of those podcasts that make you just feel smarter.

  • Security Now! - This is another of the many podcasts by Leo Laporte. Leo does this podcast with Steve Gibson, a computer security expert. This is a very technical podcast that looks at all manner of threats, from viruses to Windows vulnerabilities. Leo really helps keep the show understandable for us mere mortals because, while he's a techie like myself, he's not a hacker or a coder and always asks the right questions to help the listeners understand what Steve babbles about.

  • PotterCast and MuggleCast - It's probably fairly obvious what these two shows are about. I listed both together because the hosts of both shows do a lot of crossover, each appearing on the other's show. They even did a live podcast in New York after the premiere of "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire." Good stuff if you're a Harry Potter fan.

  • Spaceship Radio - I have to admit, I love classic radio shows. "War of the Worlds" was always one of my favorites. My Dad had a set of tapes of old radio shows and I used to listen to them all the time. This podcast plays only sci-fi or fantasy related shows (usually episodes of X-1). Plus there is a smattering of great original shows as well. I mean, where else can you hear radio dramatizations of Ray Bradbury and Phillip K. Dick stories anytime you want?

  • Skepticality - This is just a good, smart, talk show. The hosts Derek and Swoopy (not her real name, obviously) talk about subjects such as crop circles, bigfoot, the Illuminati, urban myths, etc. They have great skeptical insight on all sorts of cool stuff. Derek recently had a stroke, so he's just now getting back on his feet, but he's doing much better.

  • The Signal - A podcast dedicated solely to Firefly and Serenity two of my favorite shows/movies of all time. Not much new content lately, but a good show nonetheless.

  • Matt's Today in History - This is another one of those "smart" podcasts. Matt Datillo makes a (usually) daily podcast about a significant historical event that happened today. It can be anything from the last century, to events from Greek and Roman history as well. Each show is only about 4-10 minutes long, so it's great if you miss a few because you can listen to two or three at a time and not be overwhelmed.

  • Michael and Evo's Slice of Sci-Fi - This is by far one of the funniest and most entertaining podcasts I've ever heard. These guys are nuts about sci-fi, everything from movies, TV shows, and even the ubiquitous Star Trek novels. The best part? This is a local, home-grown podcast picked right off the vine from Phoenix Arizona.

Now I also listen to a few podcasts which are called "podiobooks." They're full-length novels that are released in podcast form, usually once a week. These are great for car trips or just sitting in bed and listening. You can find all of these at Podiobooks.com.

  • Earthcore - Ok, this is one of the best stories I've ever heard. You just have to check out the site and subscribe as I just can't do it justice. Scott Sigler is a god.

  • Ancestor - This is Scott Sigler's second podiobook, and it's just as good as Earthcore, though a bit shorter. It just finished this week so you can subscribe now with no waiting!

  • The Pocket and the Pendant - If any of you have ever read any of the "A Wrinkle in Time" books, you'll love this one. It's very similar in style and touches many different genres, such as sci-fi, fantasy, adventure, and even drama. There's even a little "Lord of the Flies" mixed in there as well. Great book.

  • Brave Men Run - Just started this one, so I can't give you a good synopsis of it (or even much of an opinion) but it's good so far.


Whew! That was a long list, but well worth it. I love these shows and don't mind at all writing about them. Now if you don't mind, I need to watch UofA kick the crap out of ASU in basketball.

Cheers.

Monday, January 23, 2006

Episode I: A New Post...er Episode IV: The Phantom Blog...I mean...ah hell

Hey! This is my first post in my new home! Wow, it feels so...liberating compared with my previous blog. I mean, I'm a fan of 1up.com (most of the time) but their blogging tools are about as flexible as a frozen twinkie. I can't even post/link my Xbox Live gamercard! And that's, you know, gaming related. I've e-mailed them about adding this feature, but of course they have ignored me completely. Figures.

So anyway, here I am! (But not in a "Three on a Meathook" sort of way. Heh, probably only 3 people on the planet will get this reference, which is about 3/4 of the total people who have seen this movie). It will probably take awhile for this blog to take shape, but I think I'm going to stay here for awhile at least. Unless Apple drops the price of .Mac accounts. Then I may publish my site using iWeb, but that remains to be seen.

Stay tuned!